----- Original Message ----- > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:57 PM, nobled <nob...@dreamwidth.org> > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Brian Paul > > <brian.e.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:31 PM, nobled <nob...@dreamwidth.org> > >> wrote: > >> I'd also like to see a new piglit test for this extension. In > >> fact, I > >> think we should require a piglit test for any new feature we add > >> to > >> Mesa. > > Sure. It looks like we're halfway there already, actually: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/piglit/tree/tests/spec/arb_robustness/ > > The one test in that directory doesn't actually test any features or > functions of the GL_ARB_robustness spec.
Yes, strictly speaking you're right. The test there tests for robustness against out of bound vertices, but it doesn't actually create the context with the robustness bit, so implementations are allowed to crash. Although I do think ours should never crash, even if no robustness bit is set. Jose _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
