https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #14 from José Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com> 2011-04-19 00:19:54 PDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > The downside is that app developers never fix *THEIR* bugs. > [...] > > And this is the disaster that we're trying to fix via conformance testing. > This crap has to STOP. This is why people think OpenGL is joke. (This is slightly OT, but I'd argue that the OpenGL problem is not that spec conformance per se, but the proliferation of vendor specific extensions, and extensions in general; and the fix is not conformance testing but the ARB ratifying the extensions people care and lumping extensions in core versions. It looks things are moving on the right direction. That said, latest core version is 4.0 and we're still in 2.1, so I'm thankful for extensions that get us half way there.) Anyway, Ian, I see you strongly feel against the proposed patch, but I still am not sure exactly what you oppose: diverging the spec, or adding the extensions to meet an application's requirement? That is, would fully implementing NV_fragment_program2 to the spec and advertising it for SPECviewperf11's sake be OK with you or not, and why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
