On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:27:20 -0700, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/05/2011 03:21 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > as patches to xorg-devel are already listed in [1], what about doing > > the same for patches sent to mesa-dev ML? > > That's not a bad idea. I'm not that familiar with patchwork. Does it > have tools for managing patches that are destined for stable releases > (that are already in master)? I think that would be especially useful. > My current system (combing messages to mesa-commit) doesn't scale very > well.
I was unimpressed with the service while using it. It was something I wanted for managing my patch queue (mark patches as accepted/rejected, see what was left), but it was down on a regular basis, and when actually doing review from the interface I was searching for the mail and hitting reply. Now I use notmuch for tracking what things I think I should be committing/reviewing but haven't.
pgppBL8ti5qeJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
