On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:42:07 -0600, Brian Paul <bri...@vmware.com> wrote: > On 03/18/2011 02:31 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Eric Anholt<e...@anholt.net> wrote: > >> I'm only interested > >> in Mesa IR for hardware that doesn't have relative addressing of temps, > >> so it's not really an issue to me. > > > > While a ir_to_tgsi is needed, I'm a quite worried that the old > > _mesa_optimize_program was needed at all to even get it close to > > comparable output. > > Since the texenvprogram.c and ff_fragment_shader.cpp code have the > same simple entrypoint, both could coexist for a while and we could > choose between them with a simple flag. I'm not too crazy about > switching to the new path if it means a substantial performance hit.
Since for us we're looking at having this be a performance win, I'll just make them live side-by-side with a flag for now.
pgpveLyk6FEfx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
