On 18.3.2011 16:50, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 18 March 2011 14:19, Petr Sebor<p...@scssoft.com> wrote:
I know that at least our games would benefit from this feature immediately,
but I guess Wine people might welcome this as well, where 'benefit' means -
do not have to
painfully install the external DXT library, which is very likely not needed
at all.
As far as Wine is concerned, not without a proper extension. At this
stage having the external library or driconf option is good enough for
Wine. In the end this is a legal problem rather than a technical
problem though.
Henri,
*
*with all respect, I encourage you to lookup the S3TC patent US 5956431
once more to see
what is actually claimed. The patent relates to image processing systems
that actually actively
perform image compression or decompression. This is actually the reason
why the Mesa uses
external processing library to be free of this legally covered stuff.
Of course, without the help of such external library, Mesa cannot claim
to support
GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc, because if it does, it has to implement
the patented
algorithm.
The situation is different in this case. I am just saying - please,
relax the enforcement of the existence
of the external image processing library in the Mesa in the cases when
hardware natively supports
DXTn formats and the Mesa client provides DXTn precompressed data,
merely allowing
a binary passthrough via well documented and available interface defined
in the
abstract ARB_texture_compression extension, allowing exactly for such
cases where the
OpenGL implementation doesn't claim the availability of given compressed
format processing,
but allowing the data to be just passed through.
In this situation, the DXTn (S3TC) related agorithms were all
implemented and used outside of the
Mesa body and as far as I can see, nothing of the patent applies here.
In the past days, applications (games) relied on the existence of the
GL_S3_s3tc
or GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc extensions, because they expected the
implementation
to optionally compress the data for them to save video memory and bandwidth,
without precompressing the data themselves.
Nowadays the situation is quite different, whereas almost any modern
game relies on the
existence of the hardware s3tc and provides preauthored data in the form
it wants
the implementation to use it, without actually requesting on-the-fly
image compression.
But just because we are all 'used to' simply check for the existence
of the GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc doesn't mean we really want to
use it at all.
Many of the current applications do not. Limited ARB_texture_compression
is sufficient enough
for all our needs.
Regards,
Petr
--
Petr Sebor / SCS Software [ http://www.scssoft.com ]
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
