On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote: > On 01/17/2011 11:18 AM, Brian Paul wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Brad King <brad.k...@kitware.com> wrote: >>> I think a63486ac is the first commit that exhibits the behavior. >> >> Have you tried reversing that change? > > I started at ef3b8042 and ran "git revert a63486ac". I resolved one > conflict (machine v. &machine) and compiled. The issue disappeared. > >> Perhaps prim[i].num_instances is zero. Could you try debugging that? >> Maybe add an assertion that prim[i].num_instances > 0 then check the >> stack trace if it fails. > > I started at ef3b8042 and added the assertion as shown below [1]. I get: > > vtk: tnl/t_draw.c:474: _tnl_draw_prims: Assertion `prim[i].num_instances > 0' > failed. > > Using gdb I get the backtrace below [2].
Thanks. Does the attached patch help? -Brian
inst.patch
Description: application/pgp-keys
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
