-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 tom fogal wrote: > Tom Stellard wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 11:01:49AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: >>> Vinson Lee wrote: >>>> >>>> Author: Vinson Lee <v...@vmware.com> >>>> Date: Wed Sep 29 13:30:34 2010 -0700 >>>> >>>> r300/compiler: Move declaration before code. >>>> >>>> Fixes these GCC warning on linux-x86 build. >>>> radeon_optimize.c: In function constant_folding: >>> >>> Why? I thought we agreed a couple years ago that core Mesa had to >>> adhere to C89 rules while DRI driver code could use C99 extensions. >>> >>> The bigger question is: Why this code being built in a non-DRI build? >> >> What configure options are needed to do a non-DRI build? > > It's --with-driver. Both xlib and osmesa don't use DRI (IIRC).
Right. So the linux-x86 config shouldn't even build anything under src/mesa/drivers/dri. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkynnEgACgkQX1gOwKyEAw/QagCaAhUYJFJFstSnpEGJB4CfqU9f Lo8An2Zcdn4U25f7kVYtjW+7oD1ptJMg =udLT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
