-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 06:13:16 +0200, Luca Barbieri <l...@luca-barbieri.com> > wrote: > >> It would be great if Intel switched to the i915g and i965g Gallium >> drivers, since everyone else is concentrating their attention on >> Gallium, since it's much easier and better to write drivers for it. > > I keep hearing this, and a bunch of people have been trying to build the > equivalent gallium hardware drivers to various core drivers for a long > time. So, can we get some details on a success story? What driver is > now more correct/faster than it was before? By how much? How much of > that was hardware enabling you did on the gallium side only?
And never mind that you can't make a conformant OpenGL driver with Gallium due to the impossibility of software fallbacks. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyIBIAACgkQX1gOwKyEAw8+wACfZCjPtxA5FQOGcqVcshvsorxB 4zsAn2LnfZ8rAqKbeySoQd7rqHArksmV =24zb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
