On Monday 06 September 2010 11:19:40 Luca Barbieri wrote: > > I'm not a fan of this patch. Technically the token is from a different > > extension, one which we never supported. We use our own representation of > > a geometry program, did you double check whether what we have is at all > > compatible with the NV extension? > > I think this will not be visible from outside Mesa, so it shouldn't > cause problems. > If not, then it must be fixed anyway.
Changing one random identifier to another is not an improvement. Especially if the latter version is in fact a lie. > If geometry assembly programs are ever implemented, then the nVidia > extension is the obvious choice, so why not use the token right now? I was never planning to do that. In fact tbh I don't even remember what the NV extension does. We're using our custom representation of geometry programs, hence why we're using our own identifier. z _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
