On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:07 AM, José Fonseca <jfons...@vmware.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 07:36 -0700, Brian Paul wrote: >> Jakob Bornecrantz wrote: >> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbra...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> Since we don't have any progs in mesa that uses glew anymore is it >> >> okay if we drop it? I have attached a patch which drops it its a bit >> >> big so I packed it. And here is the change thingy: >> >> >> >> configs/beos | 2 +- >> >> configs/darwin | 2 +- >> >> configs/default | 4 +- >> >> configs/freebsd-dri | 2 +- >> >> configs/linux-cell | 2 +- >> >> configs/linux-dri-xcb | 2 +- >> >> configs/linux-indirect | 2 +- >> >> configure.ac | 2 +- >> >> include/GL/glew.h |14435 >> >> ------------------------------------------------ >> >> include/GL/glxew.h | 1476 ----- >> >> include/GL/wglew.h | 1247 ----- >> >> src/SConscript | 1 - >> >> src/glew/LICENSE.txt | 73 - >> >> src/glew/Makefile | 54 - >> >> src/glew/SConscript | 69 - >> >> src/glew/glew.c |14320 >> >> ----------------------------------------------- >> >> src/glew/glewinfo.c | 8441 ---------------------------- >> >> src/glew/visualinfo.c | 1173 ---- >> >> 18 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 41299 deletions(-) >> > >> > This got stuck in the moderation queue, resending without the patch. >> >> Looks good. >> >> But it would be handy to have glew in the mesa-demos tree so that we >> don't all have find/install the latest version. > > Yes. > > And glut, could we move glut to demos too? It would make building on > windows easy again.
glut might be something that deserves its own repo since some people use Kilgard's glut as their system glut. Requiring them to get that from a demos package seems a little odd. But splitting it out of the main mesa package seems nice, if not just for licensing reasons. -- Dan _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
