On Di, 2011-03-08 at 05:14 +0000, Sateesh Babu wrote: > > SyncEvolution is an existing mature open source project with a history of > > functionality and compatibility, and we're confident that > > the switch to this project will benefit Sync in MeeGo for years to come. > > > > The complete MTP stack is part of Buteo contributed from Nokia. Are you also > removing it too?
No, we would like to use it. But it is not complete yet (USB transport driver still missing). My understanding is that Bernd Wachter is working on changing that; I definitely look forward to trying that out. There are also no plans to remove Buteo Sync Framework, at least not immediately. What I can imagine for MeeGo 1.2 is that we (Intel) go back to my original proposal from the Maemo/Moblin merger discussions: use the stable, proven SyncEvolution/Synthesis combination for SyncML inside the Buteo Sync Framework. What Arjan announced is the architecture decision. I'm currently working on a plan to execute on it. Right now I am (literally) talking to a lot of people to identify dependencies and options. I'll post a write-up as soon as possible (likely next week, once I am back from my US trip). -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
