On 1/24/2011 10:29 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
I agree with Aaron that just embracing what Ubuntu does and create Ubuntu-
specific versions of Qt applications is a bad idea. If dconf is the way to go,
it needs to be properly integrated into Qt instead of coming as Ubuntu-
specific bindings. Then MeeGo will get dconf for free for Qt applications.
someone is making it sound like dconf is the best thing since sliced bread.
No offense to the people who wrote dconf, but *it's just a settings back
end*.
Just like gconf is.
Mind you, gconf isn't all that great, and I'm sure dconf is tons nicer,
but at the end of the day,
end users won't even notice either of the two.
Heck, app writers wouldn't even notice the difference if you use the
proper abstraction API.
_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
