I am curious to know if anyone else is experiencing issues with FL80 on
the UB04 given the reduced field size. We are having problems populating
the "city,st zip" info from Meditech using the standard INS C,ST,Z claim
check value or even a custom that Meditech provided. Meditech is
pointing to our use of "zip+4" as the source of our problems.

 

If anyone else is experiencing problems or has already addressed this, I
would appreciate hearing from you.

 

David Parrott

Project Leader

Avera Health

Information Technology Center

Sioux Falls, SD

voice: 605-322-6167

fax: 605-322-6006

e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 



-----------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit 
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l_mtusers.com

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please visit and add information to the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l_mtusers.com

Reply via email to