Hi Pat, With a Mix request, you just submit it and Meditech reviews it and decides with development if it should be a future enhancement.. we do not necessarily get it provided in an upcoming release. The more requests that Meditech receives from various health care organizations, the more likely they will take action (I believe). If this is something that your site struggles with and you are interested in a future enhancement, please log request. If you do not know how to do this, please call me and I can assist. (401) 456-6501. Thanks!!
Thanks, Liz ________________________________ From: Patricia Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 2:19 PM To: Blitz, Elizabeth; Bodnar-Anderson, Cindy; Meditech-L (E-mail) Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] RE: PROVIDER NOT IN MIS PROVIDER DICTIONARY Hi Liz, Was there a fee for this MIX Enchancement? Thanks Pat -----Original Message----- From: meditech-l@mtusers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Blitz, Elizabeth Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:40 AM To: Bodnar-Anderson, Cindy; Meditech-L (E-mail) Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] RE: PROVIDER NOT IN MIS PROVIDER DICTIONARY Hi All, I submitted a MIX request to enhance the other provider field within ADM to work like the ordering provider within RAD/ITS but with an additional line for NPI#. Please see the following for more details: MIX Enhancement: ADM #5275118 I submitted this for CS. Please request this as well if this is an issue for your health care organization please submit a mix request as well. Thanks, Liz -----Original Message----- From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bodnar-Anderson, Cindy Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 10:46 AM To: Meditech-L (E-mail) Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] RE: PROVIDER NOT IN MIS PROVIDER DICTIONARY We have an issue with turn-around times to get new providers in... we have a separate RIS, and they say that a 24 hour turnaround to get new providers in is too long. Do others have a TAT for these new providers? Cindy Bodnar-Anderson Senior Programmer/Analyst IS, Regional Health Rapid City SD 57701 -----Original Message----- From: Bill Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:09 AM To: Julie Carlson; Cheryl Long; Meditech-L (E-mail); Elizabeth' 'Blitz Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] RE: PROVIDER NOT IN MIS PROVIDER DICTIONARY Cheryl, I respectfully disagree. It seems your facility has determined that the provider dictionary is best handled by the billing department and that is great. However the provider dictionary has a lot to do with credentialing. It also has a lot to do with Admissions, Lab, Pharmacy, OR, Order Entry, Departmental, EDM, POM, Abstracting, etc. I would venture to guess that a majority of organizations have the provider dictionary additions done by credentialing. They (should) have all the correct information on the physicians and if they don't it is their job to get it. We set up an advisory group to set policies and procedures concerning the provider dictionary. The group included the module coordinators for several of the aforementioned departments. In this way we were able to have accurate information entered by the credentialing office in a consistent format. Fortunately for us our credentialing office is responsive to the need to have providers entered quickly when necessary. If they were haphazard as another post reported theirs are, they would have to find another position. -- Bill Palmer Information Systems Financial Coordinator Mid-Columbia Medical Center The Dalles, OR 97058 541-296-7417 >>> On 5/23/2007 at 7:38 am, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED] h.net>, "Long, Cheryl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We have this process in place, but it is not haphazard at all. We auto print > a report to the individual responsible for that aspect of the provider > dictionary. What I mean by that is, there is a staff person in B/AR assigned > to this part of provider dictionary entries. Since these entries have > nothing to do with credentialing and everything to do with billing, the > billing staff take an active role in getting that information, entering it > into the provider dictionary and correcting the acct in ADM. > We have not experienced any issues with the process up to this point anyway. > Please call if you have questions. (Hi Liz) > > Cheryl Long, RN > Systems Analyst > Howard Young Health Care > PO Box 470 > 240 Maple Street > Woodruff, WI 54568 > ph (715) 356-8728 > fax (715) 356-8076 > > > > _____ > > From: Blitz, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 2:46 PM > To: Julie Carlson; Meditech-L (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] RE: PROVIDER NOT IN MIS PROVIDER DICTIONARY > > > > Please post answers to the L as we are experiencing this exact same issue. > Thanks! > > > > Thanks, > > Liz > > _____ > > From: meditech-l@mtusers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Julie Carlson > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 4:29 PM > To: Meditech-L (E-mail) > Subject: [MEDITECH-L] RE: PROVIDER NOT IN MIS PROVIDER DICTIONARY > > > > Hello L-list, > > We frequently have patients who present to Admitting to register for > outpatient Labs or Imaging studies ordered by a physician or provider who > has not yet been entered into our MIS Provider dictionary. For the longest > time we have used a generic "OTHER" as the ordering physician (in order to > get the patient registered and taken care of quickly), with research and > Provider dictionary entries made by our Medical Staff Office after the fact, > and sometimes rather 'haphazardly' at that. Because of the late entries, RAD > reports often do not get sent to the ordering provider (but get 'sent' > somehow to Dr Other), and with the new requirement for NPI numbers and > claims potentially rejecting for no NPI, among other things, we know we need > to find a solution to this situation. > > > > Is this situation experienced by any of you? If so, how does your process > work? I'd welcome any suggestions, comments, or ideas.....by the way, we are > Magic 5.5 SR3. Thanks in advance for any input, > > > > Julie Carlson > > Meditech Systems Analyst > > Cascade Valley Hospital and Clinics > > Arlington, WA 98223 > > (360)435-2133 ext 5017 > > > > > > > > ************************************************************************ **** > ** > > DISCLAIMER - > > Email is not considered secure. Confidentiality risks are assumed by > choosing to communicate with Cascade Valley Hospital and Clinics by email. > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential, privileged, or > otherwise protected from disclosure. It is intended only for the use of the > authorized individual as indicated in the e-mail. Any unauthorized > disclosure, copying, distribution or taking of any action based on the > contents of this material is strictly prohibited. Please do not rely on > e-mail to communicate health concerns or confidential information. If you > have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete it > immediately. > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may > contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated > recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that > any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its > contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, > please notify the sender at the electronic mail address noted above and > destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments. Thank you for > your cooperation. =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET. To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET. For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki ______________________________________ meditech-l mailing list meditech-l@MTUsers.com http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l ***Note: The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the Sender immediately by a "reply to sender only" message and destroy all electronic or paper copies of the communication, including any attachments. =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET. To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET. For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki ______________________________________ meditech-l mailing list meditech-l@MTUsers.com http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET. To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET. For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki ______________________________________ meditech-l mailing list meditech-l@MTUsers.com http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
