> We haven't really been treating it that way.  Dcmds and walkers in mdb
 > are frequently modified to match the kernel's private details without
 > bothering with ARC review, on the theory that mdb is essentially much
 > more like "syslog" than it is like "libc."

There's historically been a distinction between dcmds and walkers that are
inherently tied to the object being examined and those that are part of
the mdb infrastructure itself.

--
meem

Reply via email to