On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:11:27PM -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
> What did you decide to do about walk variables?  For example:
> 
>       ::walk foo f | ..
> 
> In this case, is 'f' the name of the variable where I want to store the
> walk result, or is it an argument to "::walk foo"?  Is there a way to
> force it to be one or the other?

Oops, now I see it:

        To give arguments to walkers, we extend the "::walk" dcmd to
        accept "-" for it's "variable" argument, which skips variable
        processing.  Arguments after the 2nd are passed on to the
        walker.

Sorry for the noise.

- Eric

--
Eric Schrock, Fishworks                        http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock

Reply via email to