Hi People:

We currently rely heavily on the Capture Agent…  Although we want to switch 
over to a more robust, commercially-supported capture agent, our brief testing 
with both NCast and Epiphan led us to delay that decision.

It does seem that the cheap hardware from which to build a capture agent is 
slowly disappearing.  :-(  Hard to update the OS to a new version when the 
drivers aren't available.  And not much point in updating the capture agent 
software until drivers are available.  We are being squeezed.  Maybe time to 
add a few Galicasters to our mix?

I don't really want to change anything, we finally have a reliable system, 25 
reference capture agents, all running nicely, pretty much a set-and-forget 
system.  We have passed 1000 captures for the school year, on our way to an 
expected 1430.

Warren (still trying to find robust, reliable and cheap capture agents)


On 2013-02-05, at 9:15 AM, Ruediger Rolf wrote:

Hi list,

I started this discussion on the unconference in San Diego last week and I want 
to bring this to the Community now.

I would like to propose that we discontinue the development of the reference 
Capture Agent after 1.4.

We would not delete the current code from the repo or something like this, bit 
we will not really maintain the code in the future so that it will be outdated 
in the near future, because hardware that we recommend is no longer available 
or interfaces and drivers that we use will change. We will need to create a 
mockup-capture-agent (a simpler version of the current demo capture agent) that 
will prove that our API is still working and can be used for integration tests. 
This Mockup-Agent will probably have no 3rd-party dependencies like the current 
agents so that it can be installed on any test server.

Why should we discontinue the development?
Currently only 2 developers are working part time on the CA. We hardly manage 
to catch up on know bugs. We hardly manage to keep the install scrips up to 
date with changes that come with new Ubuntu versions. We have not really 
improved the functionality of capture agent in the last releases. A good 
example for that is that the CA user interface still lacks any usability. On 
the other hand we have to compete with other open source implementations of 
capture agents and the commercial vendors, which improve their software much 
more rapidly. Especially Teltek's Galicaster is an valid alternative to the 
reference Capture Agent as it has an open source license too and works on very 
similar hardware. Most adopters that currently use the reference CA could 
switch to Galicaster.
By switching away from our own implementation we as a community could open up 
the discussion with the Capture Agent developers about improvements of the 
Ingest-API. With our own CA we would need to write an reference implementation. 
Now we would only need to update the Mockup-Agent to test the interface.

If we would encounter in the future that we rely too much on commercial 
partners with their Capture Agents we could always use our old code again and 
update it again.

I would like to know what the community thinks about this proposal?

Thanks
Rüdiger

--

________________________________________________
Rüdiger Rolf, M.A.
Universität Osnabrück - Zentrum virtUOS
Heger-Tor-Wall 12, 49069 Osnabrück
Telefon: (0541) 969-6511 - Fax: (0541) 969-16511
E-Mail: rr...@uni-osnabrueck.de<mailto:rr...@uni-osnabrueck.de>
Internet: www.virtuos.uni-osnabrueck.de<http://www.virtuos.uni-osnabrueck.de>

_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
matterhorn-us...@opencastproject.org<mailto:matterhorn-us...@opencastproject.org>
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users

_____________________________________


  Warren Long
    Senior Instructional Support Specialist
    Information and Communications Technology
    Email:  warren.l...@usask.ca<mailto:warren.l...@usask.ca>
    Ph: (306) 966-5426
    <http://www.usask.ca/>

[cid:image002.png@01CD22D0.0B536890]

<<inline: image001.png>>

<<inline: image002.png>>

_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
Matterhorn@opencastproject.org
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn


To unsubscribe please email
matterhorn-unsubscr...@opencastproject.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to