We have several rooms like that.

Bruce

On Mar 11, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Christopher Brooks wrote:

> Judy,
> 
> We have a room with two video-presentations, no video-presenter (that
> we use), and one audio.
> 
> Chris
> 
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:39:25 -0800
> Judy Stern <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Adam and I came up with a simple solution for dealing with mutlifile
>> upload in this iteration. To do this we have scoped it to handle only
>> the scenarios that we believe will be most common: 1) video-presenter
>> & video-presentation (either or both could have muxed audio) 2)
>> single video and audio file 3) video (video-presenter), audio
>> (audio-presenter), screen (video-presentation), i.e. what we're
>> currently expecting from capture agent. In all cases, the assumption
>> will be that the files are already synched; in this iteration (and
>> likely in 1.2) we will provide no synching tools.
>> 
>> If we are missing scenarios that you anticipate, please let us know
>> asap.
>> 
>> A sketch is here:
>> http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Multistream+ingest+for+MH-2680+March2011
>> 
>> Some notes: 
>> Though there are many examples of multifile upload out there, our
>> designs aren't so simple because of the current "one file per flavor"
>> limitation/feature. We considered providing the ability to upload two
>> audio files (knowing that they *could* be processed if they were
>> different flavors) but couldn't come up with a likely scenario where
>> this was necessary, so have kept the design even simpler by providing
>> the ability to upload only one audio-only file. Adam's recollection
>> of the default workflow was that if there was an audio-presenter
>> track, that it would be the one processed (rather than any audio that
>> that was muxed with video-presenter) so text in the UI reflects this;
>> if we are wrong, please let us know asap. As always, wording to
>> adequately describe flavors is tricky; happy to hear any better
>> suggestions. 
>> 
>> I've also put together a very rough sketch (with all the caveats
>> above) for a design that's more dynamic, i.e. "slots" for files to be
>> uploaded are added at the user's request. I like it because it's a
>> little leaner for 2-file uploads, but requires a lot more logic to
>> implement.
>> <http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Alternative+Multistream+ingest+for+MH-2680+March2011>
>> I know it's not perfect either....maybe there's something that's yet
>> another variation to consider. 
>> 
>> 
>> regards,
>> Judy
>> 
>> Judy Stern
>> Educational Technology Services, UC Berkeley
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Christopher Brooks, BSc, MSc
> ARIES Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan
> 
> Web: http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938
> Phone: 1.306.966.1442
> Mail: Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems Laboratory
>     Department of Computer Science
>     University of Saskatchewan
>     176 Thorvaldson Building
>     110 Science Place
>     Saskatoon, SK
>     S7N 5C9
> _______________________________________________
> Matterhorn mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe please email
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Matterhorn mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn


To unsubscribe please email
[email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to