>I have three Linux boxes behind a cisco 2501 router hooked to a T-1 frame.
>One of the boxes is an IP_Masq box. The Cisco is using NAT to talk to the
>linux boxes.
Why are you doing double NAT?
>My problem is I can telnet to the Masq box from the
>Internet, I can run lynx from it ftp, ect. But I cant ping anything on
>the LAN. Here is a copy of my routing table:
>
>Kernel IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
>192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 26 eth0
>192.168.101.0 192.168.101.10 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 25 eth1
>192.168.101.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 4 eth1
>127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 22 lo
>0.0.0.0 192.168.100.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 37 eth0
This looks hosed. You have two gateway lines for the 192.168.101.0
network.
>Anyway, whenever I try to traceroute a LAN Address (192.168.101.XX) I get:
>
>[sean@proxy sean]$ traceroute 192.168.101.4
>traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 192.168.100.10 @
>eth0
>traceroute to 192.168.101.4 (192.168.101.4), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
>
>
>It uses the wrong interface and dies. What am I doing wrong?
See the problem shown above!
--David
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
!---- ----!
`----- For more detailed info, see http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
