Taren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jul 31 10:38:35 c719777-a kernel: IP_MASQ:failed TCP/UDP checksum from
>209.144.168.10!
>
> I don't know if these messages are something I need to worry about or not.
I find these messages quite annoying. I'll probably go in and hack them
out of my kernel one of these days.
Why do the masq developers feel that this condition needs to be logged
so strongly? The rest of the TCP stack has never registered such a
warning so loudly; why is it so important when masqing?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Her lips said 'No,' but her
sometimes known as David DeSimone || eyes said 'Read my lips!'"
http://www.dallas.net/~fox/ ||
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
