John Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is discussing ipchains on this list appropriate since it appears as if
> ipchains is pretty much going to replace ipmasq as we currently know
> it?
I find that ipchains is extremely similar to ipfwadm, once you get used
to the changes in letter-options, so I find that I can answer questions
about 2.0 and ipfwadm, even though my home system uses 2.1 and ipchains.
Still, it wouldn't hurt to talk about ipchains itself, because 2.1 is
here and working, and 2.2 can't be that far off. :)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Nothing takes the taste out of peanut
sometimes known as David DeSimone || butter quite like unrequited love."
http://www.dallas.net/~fox/ || -- Charlie Brown
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
