/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! 
/* ALSO: Don't quote this header. It makes you look lame :-) */


Hello MASQers!

Welp, I have just posted another substantial update to the MASQ
HOWTO.  Lots of both critical and ease-of-use changes in
here and I hopefully met the deadline for the newest LDP
doc.

As always, you can find the newest version of the HOWTO at:

http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch/LINUX/index-linux.html#ipmasq

and at the IPMASQ WWW site:

http://ipmasq.cjb.net


And as always.. at the LDP:

http://www.linuxdoc.org

--David

===============================================================================

Changes from 1.90 to 1.95 - 11/14/00

- Added a quick upfront notice in the intro that running a SINGLE NIC in MASQ 
mutliple ethernet segments is NOT recommended and linked to the 
relivant           FAQ entry. Thanks to Daniel Chudnov for helping the HOWTO be 
more clear.

- Added a pointer in the Intro section to the FAQ section for users looking for 
how MASQ is different from NAT and Proxy services.

- Reordered the Kernel requirements sections to be 2.2.x, 2.4.x, 2.0.x

- Expanded the kernel testing in Section 3 to see if a given kernel already 
supports MASQ or not.

- Reversed the order of the displayed simple MASQ ruleset examples (2.2.x and 
2.0.x)

- Cleaned up some formatting issues in the 2.0.x and 2.2.x rc.firewall files

- Noted in the 2.2.x rc.firewall that the defrag option is gone in some 
distro's proc (Debian, TurboLinux, etc)

- Added a NOTE #3 to the rc.firewall scripts to include instructions for Pump. 
Thanks to Ross Johnson for this one.

- Cleaned up the simple MASQ ruleset examples for both the 2.2.x and 2.2.x 
kernels

- Updated the simple and stronger IPCHAINS and IPFWADM rulesets to include the 
external interface names (IPCHAINS is -i; IPFWADM is -W) to avoid 
some            internal traffic MASQing issues.

- Vastly expanded the Section 5 (testing) with even more testing steps with 
added complete examples of what the output of the testing commands should 
look          like.

- Moved the H.323 application documentation from NOT supported to Supported. :) 


- Reordered the Multiple LAN section examples (2.2.x then 2.0.x)

- Made some additional clarifications to the Multiple LAN examples

- Fixed a critical typo with multiple NIC MASQing where the network examples 
had the specified networks reversed. Thanks to Matt Goheen for catching this.

- Added a little intro to MFW in the PORTFW section.

- Reveresed the 2.0.x and 2.2.x sections for PORTFW

- Updated the news regarding PORTFWing FTP traffic for 2.2.x kernels


NOTE:  At this time, there *IS* a BETA level IP_MASQ_FTP module
         for PORT Forwarding FTP connections 2.2.x kernels which also supports
         adding additional PORTFW FTP ports on the fly without the requirement
         of unloading and reloaded the IP_MASQ_FTP module and thus breaking any 

         existing FTP transfers.

- Added a top level note about PORTFWed FTP support

- Added a noted to the 2.0.x PORTFW'ed FTP example why users DON'T need to 
PORTFW port 20.

- Updated the PORTFW section to also mention that users can use FTP proxy 
applications like the one from SuSe to support PORTFWed FTP-like
functionality. Thanks to Stephen Graham for this one.

- Updated the example for how to enable PORTFWed FTP to also include required 
configurations to how the ip_masq_ftp module is loaded for users who use
multiple PORTs to contact multiple internal FTP servers. Thanks to Bob Britton 
for reminding me about this one.

- Added a FAQ entry for users who have embedded ^Ms in their rc.firewall file

- Expanded the FAQ entry talking about how MASQ is different from NAT and Proxy 
to include some informative URLs.

- Updated the explanation of the MASQ MTU issue and describe the two main 
explanations of the issue.

- Clarified that per the RFC, PPPoE should only require an MTU of 1490 though 
some ISPs require a setting of 1460. Because of this, I have updated the
example to show an MTU of 1490.

- Broke out the Windows 9x sections into Win95 and Win98 as they use different 
settings (DWORD vs. STRING). I also updated the sections to be more clear
and the Registry backup methods have been updated.

- Fixed a typo where the NT 4.0 Registry entries were backwards 
(Tcpip/Parameters vs. Parameters/Tcpip).

- Fixed an issue where the WinNT entry should have been a DWORD and not a 
STRING. A serious thanks goes out to Geoff Mottram for his various PPPoE and 
various Windows Registry entry fixes.

- Added an explicit URL for Oident in the IRC FAQ entry

- Updated the FAQ section regarding some broken "netstat" versions

- Added new FAQ sections for MASQ accounting ideas and traffic shaping

- Expanded the IPROUTE2 FAQ entry on what Policy-routing is.

- Moved the IPROUTE2 URLs to the 2.2.x Kernel requirements section and also 
added a few more URLs as well.

- Corrected the "intnet" variable in the stronger IPCHAINS ruleset to reflect 
the 192.168.0.0 network to be consistent with the rest of the example. Thanks 
to
Ross Johnson for this one.

- Added a new FAQ section for people asking about forwarding problems between 
multiple internal MASQed LANs.

- Added a new FAQ section about users wanting to PORTFW all ports from multiple 
external IP addresses to internal ones. I also touched on people trying to
PORTFW all ports on multiple IP ALIASed interfaces and also noted the 
Bridge+Firewall HOWTO for DSL and Cablemodem users who have multiple IPs in a
non-routed environment.

- Added Mandrake 7.1, Mandrake 7.2, and Slackware 7.1 to the supported list

- Added Redhat 7.0 to the MASQ supported distros. Thanks to Eugene Goldstein 
for this one.

- Fixed a mathematical error in the "Maximum Throughput" calculation in the FAQ 
section. Thanks to Joe White @ [EMAIL PROTECTED] for this one.

- Fixed the fact that the Windows9x MTU changes are a STRING change and not a 
DWORD change to the registry. Thanks to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for this one.

- Updated the comments in the 2.0.x rc.firewall script to note that the 
ip_defrag option is for both 2.0 and 2.2 kernels. Thanks to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for 
this clarification.

=============================================================================== 

.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
|  David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware         [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
!----                                                                    ----!
`----- For more detailed info, see http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----'

_______________________________________________
Masq maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ -- 
THIS INCLUDES UNSUBSCRIBING!
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.

Reply via email to