>From the article, we are told that Mr. Li "positively delineates himself from >(proto-)Stalinist writers who adhere to a one-eyed anti-imperialism that >strongly denounces the crimes of Washington but is very restrained when it >comes to the crimes of Beijing and Moscow."
"Stalinist" or "(proto-)Stalinist" adds nothing and is plain wrong. There are people calling themselves socialist or communist but not Trotskyist who take the stated position, and there are people of the same type who take the opposite position denouncing both Washington and Beijing. I do not know of any communist who criticizes the leftist apologists for China and who feels a need to label them (proto)Trotskyist. Probsting gathers some helpful data in his critique. It is too bad he must spoil his work with sectarian and simply wrong labeling. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#35257): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35257 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/111196564/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
