On the contrary. Reimann's struggle against sthe labor bureaucracy over the years is a real struggle for working class independence. It's a service to the movement that he repeatedly has raised this. It is things this like this, and not mocking the existence of the danger from the far right, that are what is needed to help build an independent working class trend. It's exactly right that he has raised this with respect to the discussion on the election. I don't agree with various of the Trotskyist theses he has inherited, but I think he has been a breathe of fresh air with regard to the discussion on Marxmail on the election.
On 26 Oct 2024 at 6:44, Mark Baugher wrote: > > > > The administrators of this list organized a forum on the "new > labor movement". They made sure to have no speaker who opposed the > unions' ties to the Democrats. Two of the speakers - Dan La Botz and > Bill Fletcher jr. - explicitly defended those ties. And the > administrators themselves failed to comment on the issue during the > discussion part of the forum. > > This is a good example of the paranoid style in US American > politics. > > Mark > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#33176): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/33176 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109216717/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
