> On Jan 20, 2024, at 8:43 AM, Ed George <edgeorge1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/20060208202456/http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2002w52/msg00148.htm
> https://web.archive.org/web/20060208202502/http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2002w52/msg00149.htm
They're worth reading. One takeaway from this two-part essay is that it is
historically invalid to talk about "Stalinists" today since the material bases
for Stalinism is a proletarian state. There are plenty of other names we can
call people, however, as the essay links Stalinism to broader working-class
trends in social democracy, trade unions, and other organizations. I think it
has to do with 'sectorism,' IIUC.
Mark
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#28579): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/28579
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103690802/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
#4 Do not exceed five posts a day.
-=-=-
Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/21656/1316126222/xyzzy
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
