Dear colleagues,

on behalf of my co-authors, I am pleased to announce the following publication 
on population structure, gene flow and dispersal of bottlenose dolphin 
(Tursiops aduncus) populations:


Manlik O, Chabanne D, Daniel C, Bejder L, Allen SJ, Sherwin WB. 2018. 
Demography and genetics suggest reversal of dolphin source-sink dynamics, with 
implications for conservation. Marine Mammal Science, doi:10.1111/mms.12555.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mms.12555


In short:

Our analysis of dolphin genes has revealed information about their past 
migrations, showing just how crucial migrants might be for other populations. 
The new study, published in the journal Marine Mammal Science, is an 
illustration of how modern genetics can use information from genes to gain a 
glimpse into the past, unravelling past migration patterns of animals, and 
therefore help inform the future.


Abstract:

The forecast for the viability of populations depends upon metapopulation 
dynamics: the combination of reproduction and mortality within populations, as 
well as dispersal between populations. This study focuses on an Indo‐Pacific 
bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) population in coastal waters near 
Bunbury, Western Australia. Demographic modeling of this population suggested 
that recent reproductive output was not sufficient to offset mortality. 
Migrants from adjacent populations might make up this deficit, so that Bunbury 
would act as a “sink,” or net recipient population. We investigated historical 
dispersal in and out of Bunbury, using microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA of 
193 dolphins across five study locations along the southwestern Australian 
coastline. Our results indicated limited gene flow between Bunbury and adjacent 
populations. The data also revealed a net‐dispersal from Bunbury to neighboring 
populations, with microsatellites showing that more than twice as many 
individuals per generation dispersed out of Bunbury than into Bunbury. 
Therefore, in historic times, Bunbury appears to have acted as a source 
population, supporting nearby populations. In combination with the prior 
finding that Bunbury is currently not producing surplus offspring to support 
adjacent populations, this potential reversal of source‐sink dynamics may have 
serious conservation implications for Bunbury and other populations nearby.


For questions or details about publication feel free to contact me at: 
[email protected] (or: [email protected])


Cheers, Oliver Manlik


Dr. Oliver Manlik
Conjoint Associate Lecturer
Ecology and Evolution Research Centre
Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences (BEES)
University of New South Wales
Sydney, NSW 2052
Australia

E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.bees.unsw.edu.au/oliver-manlik<http://www.bees.unsw.edu.au/oliver-manlik>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<http://www.bees.unsw.edu.au/oliver-manlik>
<http://www.bees.unsw.edu.au/oliver-manlik>Assistant Professor,
Biology Department, College of Science,
United Arab Emirate University, UAE

E-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

<http://www.bees.unsw.edu.au/oliver-manlik>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Researchgate Profile<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oliver_Manlik> 
<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oliver_Manlik>
<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oliver_Manlik>
Twitter: @OManlik<https://twitter.com/omanlik?lang=en>

_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to