I am pleased to announce the publication of the following paper: 

Crockford, S.J. 2017. Testing the hypothesis that routine sea ice coverage of 
3-5 mkm2 results in a greater than 30% decline in population size of polar 
bears (Ursus maritimus). PeerJ Preprints 19 January 2017. Doi: 
10.7287/peerj.preprints.2737v1 Open access. https://peerj.com/preprints/2737/





Has recent summer sea ice loss caused polar bear populations to crash?

A paper published 19 January finds that predictions of polar bear population 
crashes due to summer sea ice loss are based on a scientifically unfounded 
assumption. Specifically, the paper addresses the basic premise upon which 
predicted population declines linked to modeled habitat loss were made by polar 
bear specialists back in 2006 and 2008 (by the International Union for the 
Conservation of Nature, IUCN, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service, USFWS), and 
concludes that when assessed as a testable hypothesis against data collected 
since then, it must be rejected. 

Those mid-2000s survival assessments predicted significant population declines 
of polar bears would result by mid-century as a consequence of summer sea ice 
extent reaching approximately 3-5 mkm2 on a regular basis: in 2006, the IUCN 
predicted a >30% decline in total population would occur, while in 2008, the 
USFWS predicted the global population would decline by an astonishing 67%. Most 
shocking, perhaps, was the USFWS prediction that ten subpopulations within two 
vulnerable sea ice ecoregions would very likely disappear entirely when summer 
sea ice routinely reached levels of 3-5 mkm2.

But summer sea ice declined much faster than anyone expected. In fact, those 
low ice levels of 3-5 mkm2 that were not expected until mid-century have 
occurred regularly since 2007. By 2015, polar bears had been living through the 
grim reality of their predicted future for almost 10 years, as the sea ice 
graphic below shows. This early realization of predicted sea ice levels meant 
the ‘sea ice decline = population decline’ assumption for polar bears could be 
tested against actual survival data (i.e., observations). 

As it turns, data collected between 2007 and 2015 by field biologists reveal 
that polar bear numbers have not declined as predicted and no subpopulation has 
been extirpated. Several subpopulations expected to be at high risk of decline 
have remained stable and at least one showed a marked increase in population 
size over the entire period, despite marked sea ice loss. Another at-risk 
subpopulation was not counted but showed marked improvement in reproductive 
parameters and body condition with less summer ice - the hallmarks of a stable 
or increasing population. 

The hypothesis that repeated summer sea ice levels of below 5 mkm2 will cause 
significant population declines in polar bears must be rejected. This result 
indicates the USFWS and IUCN judgments to list polar bears as threatened or 
vulnerable based on future risks of habitat loss back in 2006 and 2008 were 
scientifically unfounded and suggests that similar dire predictions for Arctic 
seals and walrus may be likewise flawed. Ultimately, the lack of a demonstrable 
‘sea ice decline = population decline’ relationship for polar bears almost 
certainly invalidates recent survival models that predict catastrophic 
population declines should the Arctic become ice-free in summer.

###

The forum for this paper is PeerJ Preprints, a non-peer-reviewed publication 
service which Canadian ringed seal biologist Dr. Steven Ferguson has also 
recently used: 

Ferguson et al. 2016. Demographic, ecological and physiological responses of 
ringed seals to an abrupt decline in sea ice availability. 
DOI:10.7287/peerj.preprints.2309v1  https://peerj.com/preprints/2309/


  
Susan J. Crockford, Ph.D. (Zoology/Evolutionary Biology/Archaeozoology)
Adjunct Professor (Anthropology/Graduate Studies) email: [email protected]
University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
AND
Pacific Identifications Inc. (www.pacificid.com)
6011 Oldfield Rd., RR 3
Victoria BC V9E 2J4
phone (250) 721-7296 fax (250) 721-6215
email: [email protected]
**see my author website www.susancrockford.com **
_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to