Hi Marina, all, Le 11/11/2020 à 11:09, Marina Latini a écrit : > On 09.11.2020 16:04, Italo Vignoli wrote: > > Hello Italo and Community, > thanks for your inputs here.
and thanks for yours, I fully share your analysis :) Jumping to your comments [...] >> 1. Product Label for the community supported version provided by TDF >> > > COMMUNITY: I like it and this was my instinctive initial idea. After > some researches I understood what Italo told about the "open core" > meaning of this tag. As much as I like this proposal, I think our > business model is not the open core one and always with the > target-origin approach in mind my fear is that this could be misleading. > Our community is made of volunteers, ecosystem and investors/donors and > this tag is not a way to differentiate what the version provided by TDF > with volunteers support is in the reality.> > PERSONAL: always with this target-origin approach, I'm missing the > origin here. Which tag should be used for example by the Limux project > or by SUSE or by all the others that are investing in our project with a > contract with one of the ecosystem companies for fixing specific issues > without using their LTS branded version? Why we should ask to these > contributors to use a personal tag giving the wrong impression to their > users that the software is for "for personal use only" and they are the > "bad folks" not contributing to our open source project in the proper way? agreed on both > > ROLLING/TUMBLEWEED: I can be biased here as openSUSE community member > but "rolling" is not only something unstable. ;) > Look for example at openSUSE Tumbleweed. The distro is a rolling one, in > constant evolution, it's true, you can get all the updated software > available from upstream projects and the distro has in any case a really > extensive quality work done by SUSE, its partners and by the openSUSE > community. At the end, this tumbleweed concept is not like using a > master version of LibreOffice but is closer to chose fresh instead of > still. ;) > The concept of rolling is something that I really like. it's a shared > effort from all the contributors (volunteers, ecosystem and investors) > to deliver something that works as expected without providing a long > term support version. With this rolling concept I can't see a negative > outcome also for public administrations like Munich or companies like > SUSE supporting our project in a different way. I like "tumbleweed" more > than rolling to be honest but if this concept will be selected we can > try to find a more effective and visual word too. yes I really like it too :) I tried to think further on the word Tumbleweed and its representation. I would like to propose Spring which represent the season (where everything is coming to life or growing), the source of water but also the resilience. > > CLASSIC: can be an idea too but for my taste, classic looks also like > something old, aged and I can see it more close to the distinction we > have for LibreOffice still and LibreOffice fresh instead of a way to > differentiate who is doing what and how. > > BASIC: with "basic" I can see the same issues already mentioned with > "PERSONAL" plus the negative connotation that the basic version has less > features or it has something less if compared with the supported > version. The difference I see here is much more than the lack of > professional support. also agreed on both Cheers Sophie -- Sophie Gautier [email protected] GSM: +33683901545 IRC: sophi Foundation coordinator The Document Foundation -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
