"Otto Kekäläinen" <[email protected]> a écrit : >I don't see any of my feedback addressed at current >https://newdesign.libreoffice.org/ :( > >I sent my feedback in January and read on the list that current >version is close to release. Are you still going to have a >contents/marketing appeal round before release?
Nope. However if I remember well your feedback (screenshots) has been integrated? Best, Charles. > > >2014-01-21 15:23 GMT+02:00 Otto Kekäläinen <[email protected]>: >> 2014/1/21 Charles-H. Schulz <[email protected]>: >>> http://newdesign.libreoffice.org >> >> Wow, looks very good! I have nothing to add to the design/layout. >> >> About the contents I have some comments: >> >> 1) Screenshots, screenshots, screenshots! >> >> Immediately when somebody visits libreoffice.org to find out about >> LibreOffice, they whould be presented with screenshots. In the >> carousel the first image should include screenshots so that people >get >> a sense about what it would look like if they ran LibreOffice. When >> features are presented and explained, they should have screenshots to >> visualize the description. >> >> >> 2) Free - but why? >> >> This is an old discussion, but free does not always communicate very >> well. I rather use the term open, but if you want to emphasize the >> American libertarian view and talk about Free/Freedom, the please add >> some text below each "Free Office Suite" which explains "Why free?" >> clarify the usual misunderstandings. >> >> >> 3) More facts, less marketing >> >> For example the main page has a paragraph "LibreOffice comes with a >> host of new features for its users as well as several important >> changes and improvements under the hood." It looks very good and I >> agree with the content, but in my experience people don't respond >well >> to this kind of argumentation even in a marketing context. Rather >> mention a few features and deliver some facts of what LibreOffice >> actually does. I know, writing short and good text is difficult.. >> >> >> 4) Comparison to Microsoft Office >> >> I noticed the absence of any mentions of "the competitor". Is there a >> policy against it? I hope the marketing part of the site could some >> how state that LibreOffice is as good as MS Office and it is in most >> cases safe and sensible to switch. And if you need X, Y and Z, then >> LibreOffice is even better. Take inspiration from >> >https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Feature_Comparison:_LibreOffice_-_Microsoft_Office >> >> >> 5) If this is so good, how come nobody uses it? >> >> Please add some list of famous users, e.g. the French Gendarmerie, >> City of Münich, Ministry of Justice in Finland etc.. LibreOffice is >> very popular, so show examples and figures. That should make people >> more safe to make the switch. >> >> >> >> Thanks and keep up the good work! > >- Otto > > >-- >Check out our blog at http://seravo.fi/blog >and follow @ottokekalainen > >-- >To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] >Problems? >http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >Posting guidelines + more: >http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be >deleted -- Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
