On February 21, 2014 6:30:41 AM PST, Jay Lozier wrote:
>When I read the article I got the sense of MS FUD claiming that people "need" >proprietary MS formats to be efficient. In one sense, MS is being "truthful". There is a huge ecosystem built around Microsoft's file formats: CRM, ERP, and similar software. However, there is nothing preventing the companies that create that software from also supportingt ODF in their products. (NOTE: I am assuming that Microsoft has not forced those vendors to sign contracts that prohibit them supporting non-Microsoft file formats. Given Microsoft's history, such a prospect is possible.) A second datapoint is that the major a11y vendors do not include support for FLOSS in the offerings. (Two of the biggest vendors have flat out promised that their software will never work correctly with FLOSS program.) >I also sensed that MS is very concerned about losing the European market to >FOSS and open standards/formats. Microsoft's issue with Europe is that unlike BRICS, bribes are more likely to have the company put into goal, than achieve the desired outcome. >governments believing they are doing the bidding of the US NSA. Any government that relies on any software produced by a foreign firm, is a government that is subjecting itself to known security flaws. -- Your language. Your documents. Your way. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
