Hi Florian et al,
Le 2012-12-08 07:06, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hmm, I'm really not so sure I like the new logo. Florian, would you mind
replacing it by our standard logo? Perhaps we can launch a design contest
afterwards.
Thanks,
Charles.
2012/12/8 Florian Monfort<[email protected]>
Nope, but I think that brings up a very interesting point : two pages is
maybe too much. I think we should choose between a LibreOffice and a
Document Foundation page. Having both brings confusion.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Hillar Liiv<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
Is https://plus.google.com/+libreoffice/posts cover photo changable by
You too? Or who is managing this libreoffice page?
Hillar
2012/12/8 Florian Monfort<[email protected]>
Thank you, that is exactly what I need :)
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Hillar Liiv<[email protected]
wrote:
Hello,
I send a source file, i hope you can make mods you need:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibO_community.svg
Hillar aka Medieval
2012/12/8 Florian Monfort<[email protected]>
Can I have the sources from this precise file please?
It's too small to integrate well with the Community logo resolution
standard, I need it bigger and with a larger alpha channel
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Libocommunity.png
Thanks!
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Hillar Liiv<[email protected]
wrote:
Hello,
I do not know about the cover picture, but should the community have
its own image/icon?
Something like this?
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Libocommunity.png
Hillar aka Medieval
2012/12/7 Florian Monfort<[email protected]>
Hi everyone!
Could we have a LibreOffice cover photo for our official page on
Google+ ?
Right now we're using the default theme which is not so classy...
Thanks!
--
*Monfort Florian*
While I do like the design, we should be careful in creating various
logos that may confuse our users/visitors to our sites. The marketing
team (as small as it is) is in charge of the maintenance of the
TDF/LibreOffice brand.
Our usual practice till now, was to post a proposed design on the
marketing list for discussion; if the concept was agreed by the
marketing team, it was then checked out by the design team for refining
and final voting by members of the marketing/design teams for official
use. After this, the artwork was officially added to our "Gallery of
Marketing and Design Resources" wiki page[1]. This is the wiki page
where you will find the collection of officially accepted designs for
marketing purposes.
It seems like we may be diluting our marketing and design process for
the simple reason of expediency. I am not sure if this is a good idea if
we are to try to build a solid brand with global recognition.
IMO, we should have more of a conservative approach and make sure that
our brand remains important in designing artwork.
Cheers,
Marc
[1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Visual_Elements
BTW ... as a side-note, the mish-mash of bottom and top-posting gets
really confusing. Could we please go back to bottom posting as what we
have agreed to?
--
Marc Paré
[email protected]
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
