Flexview can probably help with  tables  denormalization that's mainly use to 
avoid joins on disks 
About writes 


To keep write performance you need to have table size of all inserted tables in 
memory ? so usage flexview for that help only if you have table A insert heavy 
purged but at the same time table B would need to have less indexes  and will 
still get same memory issues  and instead of doing single write you would need 
2 writes A and B ? 
Partitioning have been created for this purpose so if you can find a partition 
key that will always insert into the same partition than you can maintain both 
tables in memory . 

About reads . 

1 - if you can put all data in memory  you will be able to get 800K reads per 
sec . if your count , group by , etc parse more than 1M like 32 Million it will 
still do 50s  to get you a result . 

Need a lot of slaves (cores) to satisfy 100 qps /s. that possible we have 
clients or users having Kilo servers to satisfy such requirements
 ( maxscale can help keeping those slaves in sync when you have so many)

2- If you wan't to reduce the amount of servers needed for big data computing 
or you can't offer to put all data in memory and also can't wait those 32 sec 
you can use a column based storage, those tools are dedicated for processing 
multi millions data reads /s  at the price of asynchronous ETL loading  
You can try out InfiniDB.  documentation and binaries can be found from the 
MariaDB Portal 

3 - Now if you think that you don't really need to read so many records like 
around a Million but that you can't afford to get memory , it's interesting to 
use TokuDB as it will parse less record per second in memory  vs innodb butwill 
use a lot lot less disks io compare to innodb or myisam. With heavy compression 
and fractal tree it is a drastic io reduction. 

4- Other solution to keep memory low is using a good flash storage like fusion 
IO , it can produce 128K reads IO per sec using1/5 in memory  that would give 
you still the million parse in less than few seconds.

5 - If you have access to many nodes to compute the same request , you can 
think spider that can split every partition into a separate server . You will 
end up having data back in memory and spider can help you consolidate all 
results performed on each server , with 32 nodes you can probably get job done 
on all nodes adding the time to consolidate. This would be possible on basic 
query plan like group and sum of a single table . but it become more 
interesting if you need a million record count that end up into a single 
partition  where data stay in the memory on the destination server . 

Hope it helps  

Stephane.
 

Stéphane Varoqui, Senior Consultant
Phone: +33 695-926-401, skype: svaroqui
http://www.mariadb.com

Le Jul 3, 2015 à 11:40 PM, Roberto Spadim a écrit :

> the main table have 29M rows (39GB, servers are "small" and old
> (2008), 16GB ram, 8core dual-cpu xeon, raid 10 hd with 4 sata disks
> 250gb each, 4 1Gbps network card )
> 20+ process updating, deleting, inserting (oltp, 1000+ qps, i think it
> will not grow with time)
> 5+ process running olap with big selects/group/order/min/max/sum/count
> etc (some queries take more than 5 minutes to end, it's not a problem
> to user, but a problem when use oltp+olap apps at same table)
> 
> today using replication to another server or mysqld process at same
> machine i don't have problem, olap and oltp runs nice with different
> mysqld process
> but when i try oltp + olap at same table at same mysqld, locks begin a
> problem, i was thinking about creating a replication at same server
> but to different table (replicate table a to table b)
> 
> 
> 
> 2015-07-03 18:28 GMT-03:00 Stephane VAROQUI <[email protected]>:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> How many writes do you have ? How much do you plan ?
>> When you read how many records and what is your business case  ?
>> 
>> /stephane
>> 
>> Stéphane Varoqui, Senior Consultant
>> 
>> Phone: +33 695-926-401, skype: svaroqui
>> http://www.mariadb.com
>> 
>> Le Jul 3, 2015 à 11:23 PM, Roberto Spadim a écrit :
>> 
>> i didn't tested but spider have HA/federate, maybe i could use it?
>> 
>> 2015-07-03 18:00 GMT-03:00 Federico Razzoli <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> I'm not sure. Flexviews should be a good solution.
>> 
>> 
>> Or you can used triggers to "replicate" the table instantly.
>> 
>> 
>> I don't understand your idea with SPIDER, how will it help you?
>> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Federico
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Ven 3/7/15, Roberto Spadim <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>> 
>> 
>> Oggetto: [Maria-discuss] doubt - replication at same mysqld process
>> 
>> A: "Maria Discuss" <[email protected]>
>> 
>> Data: Venerdì 3 luglio 2015, 22:23
>> 
>> 
>> hi guys, i have a doubt about
>> 
>> replciation on same machine, i never did
>> 
>> this before
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> i have a table running many writes and few reads, and
>> 
>> another process
>> 
>> start reading a lot, my today solution is replication on two
>> 
>> servers
>> 
>> (on same machine or other machine), the point is... could i
>> 
>> replicate
>> 
>> in same server (with only one server running / only one
>> 
>> mysqld
>> 
>> process) ?
>> 
>> 
>> something like change table A, and a background process
>> 
>> replicate to
>> 
>> table B? "many writes" will write at table A, reads will
>> 
>> read table B
>> 
>> (read can be out of sync)
>> 
>> 
>> innodb is locking a lot of rows, and myisam/aria is locking
>> 
>> table a
>> 
>> lot, both engines i have problem with lock, i consider
>> 
>> replication to
>> 
>> another mysqld process as the only solution, but i'm
>> 
>> considering
>> 
>> running only one mysqld process (if possible)
>> 
>> i was thinking about something like HA in spider, but i
>> 
>> didn't tested,
>> 
>> maybe with flexviewcdc i could have a materialized view "B"
>> 
>> of table
>> 
>> A?
>> 
>> 
>> any idea/help is wellcome
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Roberto Spadim
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
>> 
>> Post to     : [email protected]
>> 
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
>> 
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Roberto Spadim
>> SPAEmpresarial - Software ERP
>> Eng. Automação e Controle
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
>> Post to     : [email protected]
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Roberto Spadim
> SPAEmpresarial - Software ERP
> Eng. Automação e Controle

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to