ok =] some minutes to download and after start compile and tests if i not answer soon i got some other job, but i will get back =]
2014-09-23 15:34 GMT-03:00 kentoku <kentokush...@gmail.com>: > >> hi kentoku! i will try with mysql server > >> but i got one question, why mariadb don't support VP? is something > >> different that block using VP ? > > It is need some changes for MariaDB. > > > now i saw 10.0.9 at 'last' name, i will try it :) > > Please use this for now. > source code > > http://spiderformysql.com/downloads/spider-3.2/mariadb-10.0.13-spider-3.2-vp-1.1-mroonga-4.05a.tgz > binary for linux x86_64 > > http://spiderformysql.com/downloads/spider-3.2/mariadb-10.0.13-spider-3.2-vp-1.1-mroonga-4.05-linux-x86_64-glibc25a.tgz > > Thanks, > Kentoku > > > 2014-09-24 3:06 GMT+09:00 Roberto Spadim <robe...@spadim.com.br>: > > > https://launchpad.net/vpformysql/trunk/1.1-for-5.5.34-10.0.9/+download/vp-src-1.1-for-5.5.34-10.0.9.tgz > > > > now i saw 10.0.9 at 'last' name, i will try it :) > > news i post here > > > > 2014-09-23 14:54 GMT-03:00 Roberto Spadim <robe...@spadim.com.br>: > > > >> hi kentoku! i will try with mysql server > >> but i got one question, why mariadb don't support VP? is something > >> different that block using VP ? > >> > >> 2014-09-23 14:44 GMT-03:00 kentoku <kentokush...@gmail.com>: > >> > >>> Hi Roberto, > >>> > >>> Thank you for testing VP. > >>> I'll think about this feature. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Kentoku > >>> > >>> > >>> 2014-09-21 18:10 GMT+09:00 Roberto Spadim <robe...@spadim.com.br>: > >>> > Hi! Well i'm checking vp isn't part of mariadb today :/ maybe we > should > >>> > port > >>> > it first and after jmplement new features, right? > >>> > > >>> > Em domingo, 21 de setembro de 2014, Oleksandr Byelkin > >>> > <sa...@montyprogram.com> escreveu: > >>> > > >>> >> Hi! > >>> >> > >>> >> On 21.09.14 05:06, Roberto Spadim wrote: > >>> >> [skip] > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> sounds crazy? :) > >>> >>> ok i know that query cache have some problems with mutex, but it's > >>> >>> another history we could have a better hit rate with this feature > (at > >>> >>> least > >>> >>> when correctly used) > >>> >>> check that query cache become inconsistent if we change data1 or > >>> >>> data2 > >>> >>> outside vp table > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >> > >>> >> It is doable if put a lot of hooks of asking engine about tables. > >>> >> > >>> >> There is already hooks now used in table invalidation. But it works > >>> >> slowly > >>> >> (relatively) because having no open table difficult to give engine > >>> >> full > >>> >> information and so each such hook will cause semi-open process and > so > >>> >> if we > >>> >> have miss it looks like double opening overhead. > >>> >> > >>> >> So, in price of total overhead we can make it, the question is if it > >>> >> help > >>> >> so much that gain will be more then overhead in average... As usual > I > >>> >> have > >>> >> doubts about it (need a proof). > >>> >> > >>> >> [skip] > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > Roberto Spadim > >>> > SPAEmpresarial > >>> > Eng. Automação e Controle > >>> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Roberto Spadim > >> SPAEmpresarial > >> Eng. Automação e Controle > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Roberto Spadim > > SPAEmpresarial > > Eng. Automação e Controle > -- Roberto Spadim SPAEmpresarial Eng. Automação e Controle
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
