>> hi kentoku! i will try with mysql server >> but i got one question, why mariadb don't support VP? is something >> different that block using VP ?
It is need some changes for MariaDB. > now i saw 10.0.9 at 'last' name, i will try it :) Please use this for now. source code http://spiderformysql.com/downloads/spider-3.2/mariadb-10.0.13-spider-3.2-vp-1.1-mroonga-4.05a.tgz binary for linux x86_64 http://spiderformysql.com/downloads/spider-3.2/mariadb-10.0.13-spider-3.2-vp-1.1-mroonga-4.05-linux-x86_64-glibc25a.tgz Thanks, Kentoku 2014-09-24 3:06 GMT+09:00 Roberto Spadim <robe...@spadim.com.br>: > https://launchpad.net/vpformysql/trunk/1.1-for-5.5.34-10.0.9/+download/vp-src-1.1-for-5.5.34-10.0.9.tgz > > now i saw 10.0.9 at 'last' name, i will try it :) > news i post here > > 2014-09-23 14:54 GMT-03:00 Roberto Spadim <robe...@spadim.com.br>: > >> hi kentoku! i will try with mysql server >> but i got one question, why mariadb don't support VP? is something >> different that block using VP ? >> >> 2014-09-23 14:44 GMT-03:00 kentoku <kentokush...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi Roberto, >>> >>> Thank you for testing VP. >>> I'll think about this feature. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Kentoku >>> >>> >>> 2014-09-21 18:10 GMT+09:00 Roberto Spadim <robe...@spadim.com.br>: >>> > Hi! Well i'm checking vp isn't part of mariadb today :/ maybe we should >>> > port >>> > it first and after jmplement new features, right? >>> > >>> > Em domingo, 21 de setembro de 2014, Oleksandr Byelkin >>> > <sa...@montyprogram.com> escreveu: >>> > >>> >> Hi! >>> >> >>> >> On 21.09.14 05:06, Roberto Spadim wrote: >>> >> [skip] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> sounds crazy? :) >>> >>> ok i know that query cache have some problems with mutex, but it's >>> >>> another history we could have a better hit rate with this feature (at >>> >>> least >>> >>> when correctly used) >>> >>> check that query cache become inconsistent if we change data1 or >>> >>> data2 >>> >>> outside vp table >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> It is doable if put a lot of hooks of asking engine about tables. >>> >> >>> >> There is already hooks now used in table invalidation. But it works >>> >> slowly >>> >> (relatively) because having no open table difficult to give engine >>> >> full >>> >> information and so each such hook will cause semi-open process and so >>> >> if we >>> >> have miss it looks like double opening overhead. >>> >> >>> >> So, in price of total overhead we can make it, the question is if it >>> >> help >>> >> so much that gain will be more then overhead in average... As usual I >>> >> have >>> >> doubts about it (need a proof). >>> >> >>> >> [skip] >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Roberto Spadim >>> > SPAEmpresarial >>> > Eng. Automação e Controle >>> > >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Roberto Spadim >> SPAEmpresarial >> Eng. Automação e Controle > > > > > -- > Roberto Spadim > SPAEmpresarial > Eng. Automação e Controle _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
