On 5 Feb 2014, at 23:44, Sergei Golubchik <s...@mariadb.org> wrote: > Hi, Federico! > > On Feb 05, Federico Razzoli wrote: >> I just read this news from SkySQL: >> >> http://www.skysql.com/blogs/chriscalender/mariadb-1007-overview-and-highlights >> >> "XtraDB storage engine was upgraded to the 5.6 version. Now one can >> use XtraDB with MariaDB 10.0. Unlike MariaDB 5.5, in 10.0 XtraDB is >> not the default engine, the default is InnoDB, and XtraDB is available >> as a dynamic plugin" >> >> This is confusing to me. When 10.0 is stable, will XtraDB be the >> default again? If not, can someone summarize the >> advantages/disadvantages of using XtraDB? > > It is not about advantages and disadvantages at the moment. > > But XtraDB simply does not compile on all our builders - Percona has > introduced patches that use CPU atomic ops and didn't implement a > fallback for setups where they are not available (like all the rest of > the code does, including InnoDB).
Have we reported bugs upstream? Do we plan on fixing this ourselves if upstream doesn't? > > I hope we'll have XtraDB as the default in 10.0. > > Regards, > Sergei > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss > Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Colin Charles, Chief Evangelist MariaDB | t: +6-012-204-3201 | Skype: colincharles _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
