-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
On 16.02.2012 08:40, Henrik Ingo wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Bjoern Boschman > <bjo...@boschman.de> wrote: >> On 16.02.2012 00:57, Henrik Ingo wrote: >>> Percona Server is like MariaDB in that both of them are >>> compatible with MySQL and you could do a plug-and-play >>> replacement. Percona Server is much closer to MySQL (which many >>> think is great), shall I say more focused. MariaDB has more >>> deviation in the code base and also adds more stuff like >>> additional storage engines (which many think is great, >>> especially when you want to play with new features). >> >> The additional storage engine also applies to percona :-) > > > Ok, fair point, but MariaDB really goes out of its way to have lots > of them: PBXT, OQGraph engine, Sphinx, Aria... You won't find > these (unless you contract Percona to provide them for you) in > Percona Server. These are not that commonly used but more niche. > But they are the reason I commonly label MariaDB as "has more > stuff". More features even though they only apply to niche user are in general nothing bad. Some features like microsecond datetime is really something I'm gonna have a look at :-) But I don't really get the point of MariaDB grants 5 year GA support vs. Percona grants only 2 years. I'd guess that for > 90% of all available packages within the Debian project no assured support exists at all? B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk88xF8ACgkQABMWRpwdNunURACgoQOic29AFWc8DgGWnrXiVswa 6oEAnA+iF1Y617+Zup+UUbpFLiPqXIj3 =ddTc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
