Hi Axel,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:15:14PM +0100, Axel Schwenke wrote: > Hi Svoj, > > you seemed to be interested in a OLTP benchmark with a single table, so here > it is. yes, thanks a lot! Good to see that our results go almost inline. It is also good to see that we finally outperform 5.6.10 at higher threads count. :) Thanks, Sergey > > Axel Schwenke wrote: > > Here are sysbench results for 10.0.8. I added 10.0.7 and MySQL-5.6.10 from > > an earlier run for comparison. The test is sysbench OLTP ro with multiple > > (32) tables. > > Attached more results. tps.dat shows numbers for the same benchmark as > above, but using a single big table. Again the normal mutexes show some > benefits, but only at elevated concurrency. Mutex statistics are again in > the zip files. > > The other benchmark (tps1.dat) is sysbench OLTP both read-only and > read-write. It also tests concurrencies from 1 to 512. This shows basically > the same behavior. The benchmark was with PFS=off, so no mutex stats. > > > BR, XL _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
