Hi, Christian! On Feb 18, Christian Convey wrote: > > The reason I'm asking is that, while I'm generally cautious about new > C++ features, there are some features in C++11 which I'm pretty happy > about. For example, class enumerations and nullptr ( > http://www.cprogramming.com/c++11/c++11-nullptr-strongly-typed-enum-class.html > ). > > I'm trying to anticipate whether or not a patch would be rejected if > it contained those constructs.
That would need testing. At least they introduce no run-time penalty, it's purely a syntactic sugar. But I'm afraid we won't have time to test that now. At the moment we don't compile with -std=c++0x at all, so nullptr keyword is not recognized. You know what, feel free to use these features if you'd like. It's easy to search/replace and remove them it needed later. But anyway, NULL is quite ok in gcc - the compiler will issue a warning if NULL is used as an integer (in that example with overloaded function). Regards, Sergei _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
