It is a Danish Windows (Home Premium 64 bit). On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 20:07, Vladislav Vaintroub <w...@montyprogram.com>wrote:
> > > Thanks Peter. > > This might be helpful. Is this a localized Windows? Asking because error > you get is ERROR_INVALID_SERVICE_ACCOUNT, and the service account is NT > Authority\Network Service, which is “well-known” and always there. However I > recall there was some PITA with localized names for standard users mentioned > in source code in other open source projects (e.g. Wix). I was never > affected since I do not run localized Windows, though now I think I should > give them a try from time to time;) > > > > *From:* Peter Laursen [mailto:peter_laur...@webyog.com] > *Sent:* Dienstag, 1. Februar 2011 19:52 > > *To:* Vladislav Vaintroub > *Cc:* maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net > *Subject:* Re: [Maria-developers] Windows installer MWL#55 finished. > > > > I am sorry .. no luck either this time. I executed: "C:\m>msiexec /i > mariadb-5.2.5-winx64.msi /l*v log.txt" > > > > It looks like it is the service creation that fails .. excerpt > > > > CAQuietExec: Running bootstrap > CAQuietExec: Removing default user > CAQuietExec: Changing root password > CAQuietExec: Creating my.ini file > CAQuietExec: Registering service > CAQuietExec: FATAL ERROR: CreateService failed (1057) > CAQuietExec: Error 0x80070001: Command line returned an error. > CAQuietExec: Error 0x80070001: CAQuietExec Failed > CustomAction CreateDatabase returned actual error code 1603 (note this may > not be 100% accurate if translation happened inside sandbox) > > > > (full installation log attached). > > > > I specified service name 'maria52' and no such service exist. Port > specified is 3310 what is not in use. Selected default path for > installation. I am administrator user of course and UAC is disabled. > > > > -- Peter > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 19:20, Vladislav Vaintroub <w...@montyprogram.com> > wrote: > > This could be a bug I found and fixed yesterday evening. It turns out I > did an superfluous LocalFree() in mysql_install_db.exe. Interestingly, it > has crashed rather seldom, it was the first time I have seen it. > > > > Fixed here : > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.2-windows-packaging-upgrade/revision/2929. > > I updated msi installers after the fix here > http://cid-ff0c950417b4f8a4.office.live.com/browse.aspx/share . I would > appreciate if you could give new MSI’s a try . Make sure to uninstall what > you currently have prior to this experiment . > > > > To trace what is happening in installation, a log file can be helpful. To > get a log, issue > > msiexec /i mariadb-5.2.5-win32.msi /l*v log.txt > > > > on the command line. This will launch setup and write some interesting > (and lots of uninteresting) info into log.txt. If an executable launched by > MSI crashes (I presumably it was the case here), the information would be > sparse, but at least one would know at what step installation did a > rollback, which exe has crashed and what it has written to output prior to > crash. > > > > Wlad > > > > *From:* Peter Laursen [mailto:peter_laur...@webyog.com] > *Sent:* Dienstag, 1. Februar 2011 18:46 > *To:* Vladislav Vaintroub > *Cc:* Kristian Nielsen; s...@askmonty.org; > maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net > > > *Subject:* Re: [Maria-developers] Windows installer MWL#55 finished. > > > > sorry .. it was 32 bit installer! > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 18:43, Peter Laursen <peter_laur...@webyog.com> > wrote: > > hmmm .. installer rolls back. Why? > > > > 64 bit build on 64 bit Win7 (UAC disabled). Default file path. No > conflicts with ports or service name specified. After rollback there is no > track left. > > > > > > -- Peter > > > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 18:05, Vladislav Vaintroub <w...@montyprogram.com> > wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kristian Nielsen [mailto:kniel...@knielsen-hq.org] > > Sent: Dienstag, 1. Februar 2011 14:59 > > To: Vladislav Vaintroub > > Cc: maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net; s...@askmonty.org; Michael > Widenius > > Subject: Re: [Maria-developers] Windows installer MWL#55 finished. > > > > "Vladislav Vaintroub" <w...@montyprogram.com> writes: > > > > > Wizard is an MFC application. I'm sorry for that, but my Windows C/C++ > GUI programming experience is not only rusty (prior to > this > > > WL last time I used it was more than a decade ago), it is also > restricted to MFC only. Being MFC application, it will require > at > > > least VS Professional to build. There is no MFC in free Visual Studio > Express edition, nor in free Windows SDK. Build and > > > packaging process will handle missing MFC gracefully (build won't try > to compile upgrade wizard, package won't include it , and > > > installer won't start it at the end of installation). > > > > What license are we distributing the wizard source code under? > > > The reason I ask is that because of the above dependency, GPL may not be > > appropriate (and since it sounds like a new application, nor is it > > necessary). So we might consider another license, eg. BSD or if prefered > some > > other more copy-left license. Or just GPL-with-MFC-exception. > > > > I don't really have an opinion myself for one license or the other, I > just > > wanted to point out the issue to make sure it is considered by those that > do > > care. Since it sounds like if we just use GPL, we may be releasing > something > > that formally others cannot redistribute without violating the license. > Which > > I think we should avoid, even if we're obviously not planning to sue > anyone > > over it ... > > Not sure I'm correct person to start discussions over the of GPL, I think > I'm not qualified. > > I do know there is a plenty of established open source projects that use > MFC, including GPLv2, such as different incarnations of > Tortoise (SVN,CVS, BZR, HG). > > >From my point of view, it is just a system library. It came bundled with > compiler, just like other library CRT which is non-GPL > that we use extensively for quite important functionality like strcpy() or > say fopen(). Maybe this explanation will satisfy GPL > purists. I do not think CRT , MFC , ATL (libraries that come bundled with > Visual Studio) have any written license, at least I have > never seen one. The source code is available, and installed together with > Visual Studio. If one needs to redistribute one of this > libraries as DLLs, there is Microsoft EULA that basically allows inclusion > into any software . But we do not even do that, as we > link Visual Studio libraries (CRT, and also MFC now) statically, MySQL-ish > way. > > > - Kristian. > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers > Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
