On 11/15/2010 04:45 AM, Philip Stoev wrote: > Igor, > > As you have noticed I have started filing bugs that require 4-5 > tables, self joins, etc. to show up. I continue running the same tests > as before, it is just that the 2-table bugs have all been fixed by now. > > While I do consider 4-5 table bugs to still be valid, since they all > use default join cache sizes, we need to discuss and decide how much I > am going to test and how much is going to be fixed before 5.3 is > considered stable. > > Here is my suggestion: > - I will continue to run the same full grammars and file the bugs > regardless of how many tables are required to reproduce, always trying > to find the smallest reproducible test case; > - Crashes involving up to 5 tables are to be fixed; > - Wrong result bugs involving up to 4 tables are to be fixed. > - outer join + join_cache bugs are acceptable since I assume that the > outer_join_with_cache option will be ON in the final release; > - wrong result bugs requiring a very small join_cache_buffer value can > be (temporarily) fixed by increasing the minimum join_cache_buffer > allowed; > - all join cache levels are acceptable targets for testing unless you > plan to disallow certain levels altogether; > > If you think otherwise, please suggest an alternative plan. Otherwise > I assume you agree with the above.
This plan sounds good for me. Regards, Igor. > > Thank you. > > Philip Stoev _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
