Without hijacking the thread too much, Monty mentioned at OSCON about support for name:value pairs in a row. Postgres recently added a similar feature. Perhaps they can respond to that in addition to your question.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Dan Meany <dan_me...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, I was wondering if anyone here had any opinions about this proposed fix > for the 64 table join limit (originally by Sergei) > > http://lists.mysql.com/internals/38013 > > With the increased use of schemaless and hybrid, partly schemaless > application designs, this would be a big enhancement. In my own application, > being able to make minor, typed, virtual column additions for different SAAS > clients in virtual tables at runtime without changing the physical schema or > regenerating application binding layers is pretty priceless. But currently > we are limited to 64 virtual columns by this mySQL join limit. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers > Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -- Mark Callaghan mdcal...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
