Hi!
26 янв. 2010, в 10:54, Michael Widenius написал(а):
+struct st_mariaext_plugin
+{
+ const char *sversion; /* plugin version string */
sversion -> version ?
Oleksandr> actually it was string version (we have already numeric
one).
Then use 'version_info'
<cut>
I think that for staticly compiled plugins we should require that
they have also extension information. What do you think about this?
Oleksandr> It is for dynamically linked plugins. Of course
statically linked will
Oleksandr> have everything but they will be included in built in
plugins array
Oleksandr> (it is other code).
then ok.
Actually I mistaken. Here is case of lack plugins descriptions in case
of describing several plugins in one file (one array). I can put
DBUG_ASSERT instead of above code (the code is working it was
checked). At least one plugin (first) should have extension otherwise
it will be compiler error.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
