It appears that Klaus Ethgen via mailop <klaus+mai...@ethgen.de> said: >The problem of using DKIM is, that it changes the meaning of headers >slightly.
Uh, what? DKIM just adds a signature. It doesn't change other headers at all. >I do not trust any SSL-CA. But Cacert is the most trustworthy. > >With this Lets-Encrypt-stuff comes that the certificate needs to be >replaced every 3 Months. I do not have all the time to replace them that >often. > >Yea, I know, there are tools. But I wont trust that tools to modify my >configuration every Month. It seems to me that if you're not willing to solve your own problems, you don't get to ask other people to solve them for you. I have over 300 certs from Lets Encrypt and tools that renew them automatically every 90 days. They work fine. R's, John PS: >I have a very accurate SPF. But I refuse to use any other than `-all` as >without it, it would make SPF useless! I never ever want any other host >to send mails in my name! So you're saying that people who use alumni forwarders and the like just shouldn't try to talk to you? _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
