It appears that Tapio Peltonen via mailop <tapio.pelto...@gmail.com> said: >On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 at 02:05, Michael Peddemors via mailop ><mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > >> Return-Path: >> <petranader11ykqt0yededenn32wftqrztewgezgmznbm2zydz0zqzx2fzzjty2fbtzt=mjqjwjgzymdzyzvzlmjenmnjrkkmjkcezmyd=3jy...@a1.net> > >Hm, isn't the local part supposed to be max 64 characters? >That's 112 characters, almost twice the RFC 5321 max length.
Yeah, that's a problem and I know of mail systems that enforce the 64 character limit. I agree that this looks like some sort of VERP that got out of hand. If the local part were under 64 bytes, it would be fine. As Dave notes, the contents of the local part are nobody's business but the system that manages that domain's mail. R's, John PS: Try sending mail to fjpxdwzcfvjttmtpobwddboeuadtinwcatpdaynxddpepqioxerlygkouhdl...@m.jl.ly and I'll get it. But not too often please. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
