On 7/26/24 12:02, Tobias Herkula via mailop wrote:
> Thanks for the Hint, we will fix the mime-part stuff, the empty mail-from is
> on purpose, it's fire and forget
Thanks, Tobias
I've received replies to my online form submissions to GMX suggesting my
similar comments have been passed on to the developers. But I understand
you're on top of this already.
> if you don't want the reports remove the RUA entry in the DMARC TXT-RR or
> remove RUA Address Validation TXT-RRs and we will stop sending them, but we
> have no interest in any Bounces or Responses.
I know how it works, but in case someone does not, you have included an
excellent explanation in the report emails, both as text/plain and
text/html. I have only seen yahoo do something similar in their reports.
Usually there's no human content at all, or a variation of:
Attached is a DMARC report
Digging further, I see you've implemented the reporting format from the
new DMARC draft which I was not previously aware of.
It looks as if the errata from RFC 7489 has not been included in the
draft RFC, but I'll read through it more thoroughly, and supply my
comments to the author as I accumulate them.
Daniel K.
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
