Moin,

> Most mail clients don't even show the From header addresses, and what
> studies there are consistently say that even if they do, people don't
> look at them.  They're much more likely to be confused by the message
> body formatted to look like whatever they're impersonating.

I think we had that discussion as well today; Something about me
claiming that sending mails looking that much like phishing actually
trains people to not question all the other funny mails coming in; I
think that is why I said 'this is going to my "this is why phishing
works" folder' about the message you are referring to below.

> By the way, the message you got from Qualtrics that provoked this
> issue had a web bug.

Which one do you mean? The likely personally parameterized URI for the
survey, or the likely not so GDPR compliant 1px image sharing the same
parameters going to some "Watermark.php" at the bottom of the mail?

> Did you notice?

No. I at some point decided to use the "Never load remote content from
the Internet" radio button, given that essentially every second email
has one of those these days, and stop caring about them. Which, to be
honest, is not really something I am overly fond of.

I am really yearning for going back to mutt; I just need to find a
useful caldav client which i can directly feed ics from mutt, then I
could actually do that.

With best regards,
Tobias
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to