On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:36:13PM -0800, Robert L Mathews via mailop wrote: > I was mostly surprised that after reviewing it, Spamhaus's policy is that > this behavior (not using COI and hitting spamtraps as a result, for > messages that in other respects are wanted by recipients and > transactional) is sufficient to maintain an HBL listing with a notation of > "This email address is used for malicious activities".
No COI and hitting spamtraps fits my definition of "malicious activities" fairly well. > If any sender who doesn't use COI can potentially end up with a listing on > the Spamhaus HBL for "malicious activities", it doesn't seem to justify > the suggested 8 SpamAssassin points. I would (perhaps naively) expect > such a listing to be removed when it turned out to be also blocking > legitimate mail. The listing doesn't say "this email address is not used for legitimate activities". - Matt _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
