According to Bill Cole via mailop <mailop-20160...@billmail.scconsult.com>: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On 2024-02-07 at 05:40:50 UTC-0500 (Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:40:50 +0200) >Taavi Eomäe via mailop <ta...@zone.ee> >is rumored to have said: > >[Snip. Quoting Michael P.] >>> Unless you are a big budget email sender, don't stress to much. Maybe >>> tomorrow we will need something like DMARC, >but thankfully not yet today. >> You need it right now if you want to protect your communication against >> forgeries. > >Not so much. DKIM and SPF are adequate for most senders. Arguably, SPF would >suffice for most sending domains if it >were not for transparent forwarding.
You might as well publish a p=none DMARC record anyway so you can collect the reports. Some of them can be quite amusing. I agree that p=reject is of no value unless you are big enough or famous enough to be a phish target. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
