Dňa 14. júla 2023 7:16:43 UTC používateľ Thomas Mechtersheimer via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> napísal:
>I guess he means filtering based solely on the existance of a SOA record. Of course, that is what this thread about... Thanks to clarify behind me ;-) >Do you have any numbers that suggest that this specific method does filter >a significant amount of spam which other filters would not recognise? I know that you don't ask me, but consider that spammers adapted SPF, DMARC and DKIM. That doesn't means, that these methods dosn't do what they have to do. But they are not reliable SPAM mark anymore. Some months ago a collect stats about DKIM on my server: + all failed DKIMs was in legal mails, mostly from maillists + all rejected SPAMs (with DKIM signature) had DKIM pass When spammers are able to create proper DNS records directly used in email authentification, what problem will be the SOA record for them? Thus more than spammers (perhaps except some script kids), IMO that will mostly catch misconfigurations of regular people. If mission is to improve DNS, then OK. But spammers? I don't believe... regards -- Slavko https://www.slavino.sk/ _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
