Hmmm I started using dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net <http://dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net/> a few months ago, should I desist?
JD > On 22 May 2023, at 17:01, Jarland Donnell via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> > wrote: > > I have not personally run into anyone using L3 or L2 in my experiences thus > far. Their L1 list is what most, if anyone, would be subscribing to I would > think. Their L1 list is actually really, really good. > > > > On 2023-05-14 05:47, Slavko via mailop wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i read multiple times, from multiple sources about UCEPROTECT >> BL, how it is suspicious, etc... >> >> Recently i got notification from ShadowServer, that i am on >> blacklist, in particular on UCEPROTECT-L2 BL, which AFAIK >> blocks whole networks as anounced by ASN. Thus i was curious, >> what happens around me. >> >> Today UCEPROTECT reports 32 incidents for /22 net. We can >> discuss if 32 is enough for blocking whole network block or >> not, but OK -- 32 incidents is over their policy... But all these >> 32 incidents was generated by 1 (one) IP! In other words, >> one IP is enough for UCEPROTECT to block whole /22 network. >> >> Now i really can know how wrong is this BL (and no, i never >> used it, i even removed it from my check script)... >> >> I am not very interested in that list, nor in how bad that RBL >> is, but i am curious: is someone (bigger than personal) using >> it? Or do you know someone who is using it? What is/can be >> the reason to use it? >> >> thanks > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
